Key Financials
Recent SEC Filings
| Form Type | Filed Date | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 6/16/2026 | View on SEC |
| 144 | 6/15/2026 | View on SEC |
| 144 | 6/9/2026 | View on SEC |
| 4 | 6/8/2026 | View on SEC |
| 144 | 6/5/2026 | View on SEC |
| 4 | 6/4/2026 | View on SEC |
| 144 | 6/2/2026 | View on SEC |
| 4 | 6/1/2026 | View on SEC |
| 144 | 6/1/2026 | View on SEC |
| 4 | 5/26/2026 | View on SEC |
Company Information
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | VRSK |
| Company Name | Verisk Analytics, Inc. |
| CIK | 1442145 |
| Sector | Services-Computer Processing & Data Preparation |
| Industry | Large accelerated filer |
| Exchange | Nasdaq |
| SIC Code | 7374 |
| SIC Description | Services-Computer Processing & Data Preparation |
| Entity Type | operating |
| Fiscal Year End | 1231 |
| State of Incorporation | DE |
| Phone | 201-469-2000 |
Business Overview
Verisk Analytics, Inc. is a data analytics and risk-assessment company built primarily around the property and casualty (P&C) insurance industry. Over decades it has assembled proprietary databases covering claims history, weather and catastrophe events, building and replacement costs, vehicle and driving records, and underwriting rules. Insurers, reinsurers, brokers, and other risk-bearing organizations license access to these datasets and the analytic models built on top of them to price policies, assess catastrophe exposure, detect fraud, and settle claims more consistently. Well-known offerings include ISO underwriting and rating products, the AIR (now Verisk) catastrophe-modeling tools used to estimate losses from hurricanes, earthquakes, and wildfires, and a suite of claims-estimating software used widely in repair and settlement workflows.
The company earns the large majority of its revenue from subscriptions and other long-term, recurring arrangements rather than one-time sales, which is the heart of its business model. Many customers pay annual or multi-year fees for ongoing access to data feeds, software platforms, and model updates that are deeply embedded in their daily underwriting and claims operations. A smaller portion of revenue is transaction-based, tied to volumes such as the number of claims processed or reports pulled. Importantly, Verisk has reshaped its portfolio in recent years into a more focused insurance-centric pure play, divesting its former energy/natural-resources (Wood Mackenzie) and financial-services units so that the company today concentrates on the underwriting and claims segments serving the global insurance value chain.
Financial Trends
Verisk's financial profile reflects a data-and-software business with high switching costs. Because its products are woven into customers' regulatory filings, rating engines, and claims systems, revenue tends to be highly recurring with strong customer retention, and the company emphasizes its organic constant-currency revenue growth as a core health metric. The asset-light, subscription-heavy model supports notably high gross margins and strong operating and EBITDA margins relative to many industrials, and it generates substantial free cash flow because incremental data sales carry low marginal cost.
- Recurring revenue mix: watch the split between subscription and transactional revenue, since subscriptions provide visibility while transactional revenue can swing with insurance-market activity and claims volumes.
- Margin and operating leverage: the model is built to expand margins as data and software scale; investors track adjusted EBITDA margin trends.
- Capital return and leverage: the company has historically used significant cash flow for buybacks and dividends, and tends to carry debt, so interest expense and net leverage matter to the earnings picture.
- Portfolio simplification: after divesting energy and financial-services units, comparisons across periods can be affected by discontinued operations and one-time gains, so "continuing operations" figures are the cleaner read.
These are qualitative tendencies of the business model, not a forecast; the live SEC figures shown above this section reflect the actual reported results.
What to Watch in the Filings
For a data-and-analytics company like Verisk, the most informative parts of the filings are the ones that reveal whether the recurring engine is still compounding and whether the moat is holding.
- Organic constant-currency growth: in the 10-K and 10-Q MD&A, look for management's discussion of organic revenue growth by segment (underwriting vs. claims) stripped of acquisitions and currency, which is the truest gauge of demand.
- Subscription vs. transactional disclosure: the revenue disaggregation footnotes show how much revenue is contracted and recurring versus volume-driven.
- Segment detail: after the portfolio reshaping, follow how underwriting and claims solutions each perform, plus any new product lines (e.g., extreme-event/climate modeling, marketing, life insurance, anti-fraud).
- Capital allocation: the cash-flow statement and any 8-Ks on buyback authorizations, dividends, debt issuance/refinancing, and acquisitions or divestitures.
- 8-K earnings and guidance: quarterly 8-Ks carry results and full-year guidance ranges for revenue and adjusted EBITDA; deviations from guidance often drive the stock reaction.
- Free cash flow conversion: compare operating cash flow to net income and to capitalized software/data costs to confirm the cash-generative story is intact.
Key Risks
- Customer and industry concentration: Verisk is heavily tied to the P&C insurance industry; consolidation among insurers, in-housing of analytics, or a downturn in insurance activity can pressure demand.
- Competition and substitution: rivals in insurance data, catastrophe modeling, and claims software, plus large insurers building their own capabilities, could erode pricing power and renewals.
- Data dependency and integrity: the business relies on proprietary and contributed data; loss of data-sharing relationships, errors, or biased models could damage products and reputation.
- Privacy, cybersecurity, and regulation: the company holds large amounts of sensitive data, making it a target for breaches and subject to evolving privacy laws and insurance-regulatory scrutiny of rating and underwriting tools.
- Catastrophe-model accuracy: climate change and a shifting frequency of extreme events challenge model assumptions; perceived inaccuracy could hurt the flagship modeling franchise.
- Leverage and capital allocation: debt used to fund buybacks and acquisitions exposes earnings to higher interest costs, and acquisitions carry integration and goodwill-impairment risk.
- Valuation sensitivity: as a high-multiple compounder, the shares can be sensitive to any slowdown in organic growth or margin expansion.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Verisk Analytics make money?
Verisk primarily licenses proprietary insurance data and analytics on a recurring subscription basis, plus some transaction-based fees. Insurers, reinsurers, and brokers pay for access to its databases, rating and underwriting tools, catastrophe models, and claims-estimating software, which are embedded in their day-to-day operations.
What segments does Verisk report in its filings?
After divesting its former energy (Wood Mackenzie) and financial-services businesses, Verisk operates as an insurance-focused company. Its filings center on insurance solutions spanning underwriting (rating, data, catastrophe and extreme-event modeling) and claims (fraud detection, claims estimating and settlement). Check the latest 10-K segment footnote for the current presentation.
Why is recurring revenue important when reading Verisk's 10-K?
Because most of Verisk's revenue is subscription-based and tied to products embedded in customer workflows, recurring revenue and organic constant-currency growth are the clearest signals of demand and retention. The revenue disaggregation footnotes show how much is contracted versus volume-driven and transactional.
What are the biggest risks disclosed for Verisk?
Key risks include concentration in the P&C insurance industry, competition and customers building in-house analytics, dependence on proprietary and contributed data, cybersecurity and data-privacy exposure, the accuracy of catastrophe models amid climate change, and financial leverage used to fund buybacks and acquisitions.